Republican Governor Hopeful in California Criticized For Valley Floor Donation
by Watch Staff
Nov 20, 2009 | 1602 views | 13 13 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Controversy Shows Rift In GOP

TELLURIDE – The conservative credentials of local homeowner, former eBay chief executive officer and California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman have come under fire in that state after her 2008 tax returns disclosed that her charitable foundation gave $1.15 million to Telluride’s Valley Floor Preservation Partners, the San Jose Mercury News reported on Tuesday.

Whitman also received criticism for giving $200,000 to the Environmental Defense Fund for its work in California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta while positioning herself against environmentalists once she decided to run for governor, according to the news account.

Whitman’s assistant campaign manager Tucker Bounds told the Mercury News that Whitman made the donations before deciding to enter the governor’s race and that she stood by her donations.

“Meg has consistently been on the side of jobs and people first,” he was quoted in the article.

The VFPP was established in March 2006 as a partnership between the Town of Telluride, local conservation organization Sheep Mountain Alliance, the National Trust for Historic Preservation and The Telluride Institute to launch a fundraising and education campaign to acquire property located outside Telluride’s municipal boundaries owned at the time by the San Miguel Valley Corporation.

One month earlier Telluride’s electorate had rejected a court-ordered mediation agreement that would have allowed some development on the 572-acre parcel, instead voting 603-439 in a special election to pursue its condemnation.

In February 2007 the case went to trial in Delta County, Colo. and there the jury there awarded the SMVC $50 million for the property.

Bounds said that Whitman became involved in the issue “only after the landowner had received his asking price of $50 million,” the Mercury News reported.

“She strongly believes that the government should not be able to arbitrarily seize land from private citizens,” he told the publication.

The SMVC appealed the decision to the Colorado Supreme Court, but in June 2008 it handed the Town of Telluride a decisive victory in a 6-1 decision.

Shortly thereafter the town officially acquired the land.

“Land conservation is not by any means a partisan issue,” said Hilary White, program director for the VFPP during its fundraising campaign for the Valley Floor.

“It’s peoples connections with landscapes that drive their interest,” regardless of political affiliation, she continued.

Although White neither confirmed nor denied Whitman’s contribution and would not speak directly to the controversy, she said that a number of people who were philosophically opposed to the town’s decision to condemn the Valley Floor did provide financial support to the VFPP once it became clear that SMVC would receive “fair market value” for the land.

At that point, “People were much more willing to be involved,” she said.

If anything the incident may serve to illuminate a Republican Party that is struggling with its identity.

“The party is coming off of two straight election losses,” said Jim DiPeso, policy director for Republicans for Environmental Protection, who suggested that the GOP is in the midst of trying to figure out whether it’s the “big tent of Ronald Reagan” or a “straight jacket” where only people who adhere to certain strict ideologies need apply.

“Since when is it not conservative for a Republican to care about land conservation?” he said.

“Conservatives pioneered the conservation of open space,” he continued, noting Republican President Theodore Roosevelt’s role in expanding the national forests, parks and wildlife refuges, and that President Herbert Hoover proclaimed the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument.

“Clearly Teddy Roosevelt knew that the protection of our natural heritage was important for keeping the country strong,” he said.

And not for nothing –Richard Nixon signed the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and also established the Environmental Protection Agency, the REP website notes.

DiPeso suggested that “hard right ideologues” are behind the idea that somehow conservatism and conservation are mutually exclusive.

“They are showing they don’t know the first thing about what being conservative is,” he said.

“I think it’s a non-issue,” San Miguel County Republican Party Chairman Harley Brooke-Hitching said, suggesting that the Whitman controversy is more politically motivated than substantive.
comments (13)
« thcpa wrote on Friday, Nov 27 at 06:58 PM »
Meg must be nuts..running to run the biggest joke of a government since .... well, who knows..

Imagine being called a governor when all you are is a baby sitter.

As far as the Floor...its ours, we bought it, we need to pay it off and then clean it up. What other choices are there?

IMHO, if there were issues with the VFPP, Blue's attorneys would have exploited them for their benefit..

Meg, quit before you win..no kidding.
« yes, servicer wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 12:06 PM »
Yes, servicer, the uber-rich are the problem in this country. The wealth divide is greater now even then 1929. The national solution is to tax the hell out of them to bring back some semblance of balance. The local solution is to quit predicating our economy on their wants and needs. It's true, we might not have been able to preserve the VF without the help of the Witman's of the world. But then again it wouldn't have been put in imminent threat of trophy home development without the Blue's of the world.
« servicer wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 08:51 AM »
Ya'll have missed the mark-Meg Whitman is the problem,and those like her. She did a secret closing on Skyline Ranch -after the title company and the realtors had spent alot of time and work on her closing documents-she took her closing to another title company on a weekend and did not pay the realtors comission. 15 million dollar property-but she did not want to pay her contract obligation.She was sued and setteled. Honesty is a virtue.

It's people like her- in her cloak of greenery,that have wrecked Telluride. She donated million-s to make her property more valuble.Tom Cruise, Mayor Pryor and all the other large donators jacked up property values and benefitted. They left us holding the tax bill.Can you afford a 1 or 2 million dollar tax write off ? I cant.Meg Whitman has enough money to control any real estate market she chooses.it behooves her to cloak herself in greenery-then no one will see what she is really up to.

To not mistaken-you obviously have not been in town lately-its being shuttered up.The servicers are leaving and the uber rich will have no one to service them.Hey but thats okay- if Meg wants to sell her property at a loss she'll get another tax break.

« Wait a minute wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 08:51 AM »
"And fortunately, since we're not riding so high on real estate, we're sloughing off quite a bit of dead wood--namely the people were just here for a quick buck and don't give a crap for our incredibly beautiful local environment. "

Nice, real nice. So what about the working stiffs that moved here FOR the environment and great lifestyle and might have to move because it's getting even harder to make ends meet around here? Are we dead wood too? I've sacrificed almost 20 years of my life here making a modest (teeny by most people's standards) nest egg for me and my family and now it's looking like we might have to uproot and move somewhere else. That blows. Not everyone caught up in this real estate mess is a greedy goon out to destroy community and the world. Think about those caught up in the middle. Who's gonna help us? I have no trustfund, no inherited house, nothing like that. I live paycheck to paycheck. Regardless, I love life, thank the heavens for my fortunes and all I ask is let me have just a little scrap from your pie cause you can't possibly need ALL of it! Thanks.
« not mistaken wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 05:38 AM »
As you can see, no $ amounts are associated with the donors names and no names are on the list unless they wanted to be there. Moreover, tax returns are confidential unless they are made public by the taxpayer. Obviously, as a election candidate, Ms. Witman chose to divulge hers. ( some don't, for instance Cindy McCain).

Thankfully Telluride is an important tourist destination, and as real estate tanks throughout the country, Telluride can weather the national recession better than most. Namely because some of our citizens had the foresight not to trash it for short-term real estate profits. And fortunately, since we're not riding so high on real estate, we're sloughing off quite a bit of dead wood--namely the people were just here for a quick buck and don't give a crap for our incredibly beautiful local environment.

« Blow me Down wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 03:39 AM »
You seem to be mistaken.

If you go to the Valleyfloor.org website it appears that all of the donors, including the mysterious "wishing well" and Ms Witman are all listed.

It would seem that in America you would indeed have a right to have your donation kept secret, but only if you did not take it as a IRS Tax write-off to reduce your taxes.

Another question or two.

What if you gave it to an organization that partnered with an outfit like the Town of Telluride that co-mingled all the funds, a public entity, would you then have to meet the disclosure and full public access rules for the information?

If we saved one America's most beautiful valleys from "hideous trophy home development" what standard are you using to claim this is one of America's most beautiful valleys?

Would a valley without a highway running through it with 5000 cars a day and a power line running through it, and an old railroad right of way running through it, and a river that has been moved and is polluted by mine tailings, and is not pristine, or wild, and is surrounded by development, be the perfect candidate or one that would be classified as "one of America's most beautiful valleys?

If not, what would be the perfect candidate?

If asking questions sends people wanting to live in Telluride "scurrying", why is that a goal of the Town of Telluride?

Why is that the goal of the Preservation Partners?

By "the mass exodus" do you mean the people that you and the Preservation Partners do not approve of, or just the ones that cannot afford to live in Telluride without a job "scurrying"?

Are you celebrating the economic downturn, loss of jobs, foreclosures, and "scurrying" of people trying to make a living in Telluride?

Do you think that during the many boom and bust cycles of Telluride's history that there was ever another person like you that sat on a street corner and cheered as family after family packed up and moved somewhere else where they had a chance of making a living?

Do the Preservation Partners really have $940,137. in the bank like their 2008 tax return indicates?

Was $50 million the owners "asking price" for the property as Ms. Whitman claims?

Was the property for sale?

If so, why didn't the Town just buy it?

Now that the town owns it, can it afford to make the payments?

What happens if the town cannot make the payments?

If the town declares bankruptcy what happens?

So you think we could ever build affordable housing out there?

How about a hospital or medical facility.

How about a school?

Do all the Board members of the Preservation Partners own nice big homes in Telluride?

« to the liar Blow me wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 05:00 PM »
The Valley Floor Preservation Partners have kept donors confidential at donor's request. It is your right as an American to keep your charitable giving confidential if that is your wish. If Ms. Wittman disclosed her donation, it was at her discretion.

All donors, including Ms. Wittman, should be proud that they saved one of America's most beautiful valleys from hideous trophy home development. But, Blow Me, just keep whinging. You just send the people whose behinds you wish to kiss scurrying. Their mass exodus just brings Tride back to the place I love.
« Sweet... wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 03:26 PM »
keep prying, I'd like to know. Town politics are so sordid.
« Blow me Down wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 02:35 PM »
Meg Whitman's two million dollar plus donation was announced by Mayor, at the time, John Pryor in Elks Park in front of several hundred people to great fanfare.

It was also announced in both newspapers.

Do you think John got his information from the Preservation Partners, or do you think he made it up?

Was John Pryor a Preservation Partner?

Or, was he just going door to door asking for money on his own behalf?

Or, maybe he was going door to door on behalf of the Town of Telluride?

Do you think that is "co-mingling" or just confusing to the people that you are hitting up for money?

Do you think that some people might think that John Pryor and the Town would look favorably or unfavorably on the response of people--I mean whether you gave money or not--especially if you did business with the town--like live there?

Do you think that there should be a public accounting of ALL of the money?

Do you understand that slander is verbal and libel is written?

Meg Whitman has apparently opened a can of worms, and not just for her candidacy for the Republican Governor of California.

Beyond, bull-dozing and destroying Skyline Guest Ranch and being in conflict with the zoning of San Miguel County by closing the Guest Ranch, do you think Meg Whitman is going to get the Republican nomination for Governor of California?

Do you think there is a reason why no other land conservation organization in the world would touch or respond to the Request for Proposals to manage the conservation easement on the Valley Floor other than our own local San Miguel Conservation outfit?

Do you think that some of the Preservation Partners and the San Miguel Conservation Foundation are the same people, or related to each other, or in business with each other?

Can I assume that when you say, "Please get the flock out of here" that you are really just using the "F" word and disguising it so it gets past the rule of no bad words?

Do you mean that as a threat?

Or, just a suggestion?

Do you think a Grand Jury could get to the bottom of all of this?

Would you like to testify?

Would you like to suggest to a Grand Jury to "get the flock out of here?"
« slander wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 01:08 PM »
The slanderous part of your statement was that "it was publicly announced by the Valley Floor Preservation Partners that Meg Whitman gave more than $2 million." And "the Town Council and the Board of the non-profit were some of the same people and those same people scooped up lots of cash and other goodies."

But I guess lying is just par for the course for you. Yes, please, get the flock out of here.
« Blow me Down wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 11:31 AM »
So why didn't the Valley Floor Preservation Partners publish or at least make public the list of donors?

Is there some secret that "us people of Montrose intellect" are not qualified to know?

Or, some Telluride rule that people that do not drink the rich-kid, elitist, and mind-numbing Telluride kool-aid just wouldn't understand?

Or, is it just that Telluride's Billionaires are just better than Montrose's hard working plumbers, electricians, stone masons, carpenters, etc. that built most of your billionaire's ungreen, unsustainable, unrenewable, unconservational, unenergy efficient, unfriendly and just plain grossly egotistic, monstrously large homes.

Seems like the Valley Floor Preservation Partners are the "teabaggers" here.

Flaunting their power and connections in high places so that the law of the land is just for others--not Telluride's elite Preservation Partners.

Just who are these partners?

Could you at least publish your names?

As for slander, let's be clear: When is asking questions considered to be slander?

Unless, of course, someone is asking questions that the Valley Floor Preservation Partners, or the Town of Telluride Town Council, or the Town's Town Manager, Town Attorney and Budget director don't want asked.

What ever happened to the public's right to know?

Looks a lot like a secret elitist society masquerading as an honest, hard-working, transparent and democratic organization to me.

Give me liberty or send me to Montrose where liberty still means something.
« Uh....no, Blow me wrote on Saturday, Nov 21 at 05:51 PM »
The VFPP didn't publicly announce any donations. Instead of slandering the organization, why not go join a teabagging party in Montrose. Your intellect would fit right in.
« Blow me down. wrote on Saturday, Nov 21 at 02:02 PM »
How is that it was publicly announced by the Valley Floor Preservation Partners that Meg Whitman gave more than $2 million.

Just another accounting error?

On whose part?

The Preservation Partners or Meg Whitman?

Well, when the Grand Jury finally has the time to take a look into the accounting of the whole mess, maybe we will find out.

So, the Town of Telluride entered into a partnership between the Town and a non-profit, but the Town Council and the Board of the non-profit were some of the same people and those same people scooped up lots of cash and other goodies and did what with them?

Do we not need a "forensic accounting" of all funds and compare that to the amount of money claimed to have been raised and then compare it to all the IRS returns?

Could the Town be held liable for the actions of their partners when they were the partners or the partner of the partners that were in cahoots with the partners.

People went door to door collecting cash.

People threw money in a phony wishing well.

I know I deposited several hundred thousand in the wishing well and claimed it on my taxes.

But, I'm honest.

If this is public money that the Town is responsible for should all the books be open to full public review.

Should the names and amounts claimed to have been given been published by lets say--The WATCH.

Is the Watch a newspaper or a time piece?
sponsored advertisement
sponsored advertisement
sponsored advertisement